b5media.com

Advertise with us

Enjoying this blog? Check out the rest of the Entertainment Channel Subscribe to this Feed

Film Gecko

Dakota Fanning to play Jane in "New Moon"?

by Jane Boursaw on January 22nd, 2009

How do you feel about Dakota Fanning playing Jane Volturi in "New Moon"? The Twilighters on Film Gecko sure have lots to say about it here and here.

Fanning’s reps confirmed today that the 14-year-old actress has been offered the role of Jane, a member of Italy’s evil Volturi, for the "Twilight" sequel, "New Moon." 

No deal has yet been made, and Fanning has NOT met with "New Moon" director Chris Weitz nor Summit Entertainment, the studio behind the franchise. Rumors of the offer were swirling online before Fanning’s camp even received the official one. They’re scheduled to meet with Weitz and company next week.

"New Moon" is set to begin shooting in March in Toronto and Italy.

Your thoughts on this? Are you ok with Dakota Fanning onboard as Jane Volturi?

Image: Newscom

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

POSTED IN: Action/Adventure, Casting News, Celebrity Gossip, Celebrity Pictures, Development, Drama, Fantasy, Film, Film Genres, Film Industry, Movie Sequels & Prequels, Movie Stars, Movies, Personalities, Romance

108 opinions for Dakota Fanning to play Jane in "New Moon"?

  • Mary
    Jan 23, 2009 at 6:59 am

    UM….i am pretty sure that Jane Volturi is described “short brown hair” and “dark skin” and “Italian”. i am a fan of Dakota, but I CAN NOT imagine her playing Jane Volturi. Are they sure they aren’t describing Tanya, from the Alaskan Coven???

  • Sherry
    Jan 23, 2009 at 7:19 am

    I love Dakota Fanning, she’s consistently shown that she’s a fantastic actress. That being said, I really don’t see her as Jane. It’s hard to imagine.

  • Amber
    Jan 23, 2009 at 11:48 am

    I DEF can NOT see Dakota as Jane…..I am thinking she is too known to play this role! It needs to be played by a fresh face…..Im thinking someone like actress Rebekah Kennedy!! Check her out peeps!

  • caitie
    Jan 23, 2009 at 8:20 pm

    I’m thinking she looks the part, but I’m not sure if she’ll be able to pull it off.. I think that they should check out Annasophia Robb.. She looks like what they are looking for, and she could bring out the dark part of the role also.. Just my opinion.

  • Cynamon Mantley
    Jan 23, 2009 at 8:42 pm

    No offense but she has that good girl look to her and i do not see her as the vampire Stephanie describes. I have a feeling shes suppose to be darker

  • twilight fan
    Jan 24, 2009 at 9:59 am

    light brown hair and the skin is dark almost black
    not to mention she is the same size as alice.she is later called a little girl when edward jumped at her but I still think that they should keep to the description in the book. im sorry but Dakota is not these things and I dont think that she can pull off the evil that jane truley is.

  • BrokenWingedAngel
    Jan 24, 2009 at 1:46 pm

    Personally I feel as if they are ruining to Twilight series by giving people like Dakota Fanning(no offense because I love her and think she is an amazing actress) and Vanessa Hudgens(I really hate her and think she can’t act to save he life) jobs in the Twilight series. We want unknown actors. Also Jane is described as having brown hair and most people I have talked to and seen reviews online they have pictured her darker.Meaner.I personally think they should have open casting calls. Not in a lot of places but like New York City,Los Angeles, Orlando, Atlanta, Nashville and a few other cities around the country.Maybe even a few in Italy.

  • twilightgirl
    Jan 24, 2009 at 2:50 pm

    jane is supposed to be short with short dark hair and a pretty face. there’s nothing about her skin, but it can’t be “almost black” twilight fan, because vampires skin is white. and i agree with her having a too innocent good girl look. i think they should use unknowns for jane and alec.

  • Elizabeth parker
    Jan 24, 2009 at 3:50 pm

    NO ! I can not see dakota playing the part of JANE . She is not pretty enough to be her .
    Also, she looks nothing like described in the book.

  • sunshine
    Jan 24, 2009 at 4:14 pm

    i might be mistaken but “almost black” was referring to her cloak, not her body. i’m curious, does the book ever say that jane is italian? i know the volturi live in italy- but i was under the impression that non-italian people could still join if they had useful powers.

    either way, i don’t think dakota fanning should get the part. she is talented, she can be sweet and scary, but i agree with twilight girl- an unknown would be better. when i watched twilight, i saw bella, not kristen stewart. but in new moon, i think most people are going to see dakota fanning and very little jane- no matter how great her performance is.

  • jessie c.
    Jan 24, 2009 at 5:27 pm

    i really…..i think dakota is going to ruin this movie it sucks i hope she dosent do it….but she said she would love to and apperantley they just offered it to her. like first. ughh. i dont want her in this movie and i could never see her as jane…

  • Nichole
    Jan 24, 2009 at 5:30 pm

    Dakota Fanning would be the WORST PERSON EVER.!!!!!!!!
    To play Jane. OMG.!!

  • jessie c.
    Jan 24, 2009 at 5:34 pm

    sunshine- i sooooo agree with you!

  • anonymous
    Jan 25, 2009 at 10:31 am

    As great of an actress Dakota Fanning I don’t think she would be able to pull Jane off, due to her Nice-Girl image! Also, I so agree that the movie would be better if there were more unknown actors in it.

  • Mrs.cullens
    Jan 25, 2009 at 7:57 pm

    I am sorry but I don’t think Dakota fanning can do this, They should really think about AnnaSophia Robb. She has the evil look in her eyes, and well I don’t think the movie can take in another poor actress (kristen stewart). But thats my oppion.

  • australiahot
    Jan 26, 2009 at 5:50 pm

    i cant see her as jane she dosnt cut it she dosnt have a connection like the other actors and actresses in the movie and jane has brown hair and dark skin she looks to nice to play the part while jane has something evil sorry dakota but u dont make my list of janes

  • shelby
    Jan 26, 2009 at 7:40 pm

    I vote a big NO on Dakota, I liked all her movies, but Jane? Come on. Jane is suppost to be Dark haired, dark skinned and Italian, I agree with the person who said she is well to known

  • Emma
    Jan 26, 2009 at 9:04 pm

    Yes she is a good pick! Jane has an angel-like face and is small and blonde. But I think ANNASOPHIA ROBB would be an even more PERFECT pick for the role of Jane!

  • hi ya ppls
    Jan 27, 2009 at 6:52 pm

    she cant be jane !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! its just to stupid id make a better jane she sucks so much theres no way .!!!!!!!!!!! i just cant stand this any longer they better get someone else reallllllly stupid i cant see her hurting ppl shes to nice

  • Emma
    Jan 27, 2009 at 7:48 pm

    NO, she would be amazing! And no she is just nice in real life, she can act superbly and definitely pull this off!

  • C.J
    Jan 29, 2009 at 9:14 am

    I really like Dakota but I dont see her playing Jane in New Moon! The person I would definately pick for Jane is Danielle Chuchran.. look her up on IMDB, She is pretty but has very intense eyes.

  • Twilightgirl28
    Jan 30, 2009 at 3:56 pm

    I don’t think Dakota is the right person for the part either. I am an older fan of Twilight and I just cannot see someone of her age playing that part. Plus like others have said a person who is not so well known would be better. Yes she is a good actress but no she is not right for the part.

  • Twilightwhat
    Jan 31, 2009 at 12:33 am

    I la-la-love Dakota Fanning, for the way she can pull off this awesome, serious, partially sarcastic kind of character, for some of the roles given to her in the past. Although, if she mixes in with the Twilight cast, that’d be depressing, especially some of the cast are comeback actors and actresses and Dakota is well-known to people since ever.

  • schye
    Jan 31, 2009 at 10:37 am

    i think that Dakota Fanning could defanatly pull this off.
    She can be a creepy and dark vampier.
    I think it would show her diversity as an actress.
    Dakota should defanatly sign on as Jane in “New Moon”
    I think she is ideal for this role and personaly i would be dissapointed if she isnt cast as jane!

    I honestly think she can totaly pull it off
    dakota has played darker roles before and can defanatly do it again for “New Moon”

    i think stephanie myer would accept Dakota as Jane.
    And as far as the dark hair dark skin i would just like to say there is make-up and hair dye

    so all of you who think dakota cant pull it of because of those reasons, suck it up it can all be altered ok

  • JAMIE
    Feb 1, 2009 at 1:52 am

    OMG! GO ON THIS LINK http://stephlesx13.deviantart.com/art/Jane-111305034

    THERE IS A GIRL CALLED ‘Jordana’ AND SHE WOULD BE THE PERFECT JANE! SHE LOOKS EUROPEAN . SHE HAS PALE BROWN HAIR TRIMMED SHORT. AND SHE IS SKINNY!!! STUFF DAKOTA ! GO JORDANA

  • CLAUDIA!
    Feb 1, 2009 at 1:53 am

    ZOMGGG, NO NOT DAKOTA………:)
    CLICK ON THIS LINK!
    http://stephlesx13.deviantart.com/art/Jane-111305034/

    LOL SHE MATCHES PERFECTLY AND IS A GREAT ACTOR:)
    her name is Jordana, and she would be a perfect Jane!!!!!!!
    PROTEST WITH ME!! LOL

    Description:
    Hair color: Light Brown
    Hair length: Short
    Skin color: Pale (oh this just keeps getting better !! :D ) lol
    Height: Suitable for Janes character

    here is the link again =]

    http://stephlesx13.deviantart.com/art/Jane-111305034

    credit to stephanie who took the photo!
    PLEASE CLICK!

    http://stephlesx13.deviantart.com/art/Jane-111305034

    lol:P

  • claire-bear
    Feb 1, 2009 at 1:55 am

    OMG JAMIE IS SOOOOOO RIGHT! I REALLY DID NOT WONT DAKOTA PLAYING JANE! JORDANA IS SOOO MUCH BETTER!

  • Gabbie
    Feb 1, 2009 at 1:57 am

    hey Jamie, i went on the linked site and i agree, that girl is perfect for the part. Its funny cause thats exacly how i imagined her. i showed my friends and they totally agree. Dakota fanning is great but nothing compared to Jordana by the looks of it. Judging by the picture she is great with the camera..cant wait and it would be awesome to see her get the part.

    if you read this jordana i hoep you get the role of jane! im a big fan already!
    x

  • anna
    Feb 1, 2009 at 2:08 am

    Jordana would be the best Jane. seriously! she matches the description so much. dakota .. not good… jordana… GREAT
    Dakota is a too well known actress. the hole cast isnt that well known. jordana is not that well know, she would do FAB in new moon. TEAM JORDANA NOT DAKOTA
    !!!!!!!!!!

  • sara :) USA ALL THE WAY!
    Feb 1, 2009 at 2:20 am

    omg dakota was what i thought would be a great jane. but that link that ‘Jamie’ sent.. that girl jordana would be perfect.

    good luck ya’ll

    team jordana :) hehe

  • Emma
    Feb 1, 2009 at 11:46 am

    uHHH no that Jordana girl is sooo not right.

  • Liana
    Feb 2, 2009 at 1:44 am

    ‘Emma’, are you serious?
    I just clicked on the link.
    She would be great! lol

  • nicolee
    Feb 2, 2009 at 1:55 am

    OMG THIS EMMA CHICK MUST BE DELUTED :@:@:@ JORDANA WOULD BE BEST LIKE SERIOUS SHE WOULD BE SO MUCH BETTER THAN THIS DEKOTA *shivers at the name*

    WE ALL AGREE WE CLAUDIA AND YEAH SHE’D BE BEST (Y)

  • yeah.no.
    Feb 2, 2009 at 3:01 pm

    Uhhh no this Jordana girl would not do well AT ALL! She doesn’t even look the part. She doesn’t have a botelli-like angel face!! And her nose is too long.

  • alice cullen
    Feb 2, 2009 at 5:14 pm

    umm… no way….she cant be jane….she will ruin the movie…no offence to her…but i cant see her as jane….i think miranda cosgrove should play jane….she looks the part and shes awesome…

  • :O
    Feb 3, 2009 at 1:12 am

    Message for ‘yeah.no’ you said that Jordana does not have a botelli-like angel face……WELL ‘WHO DOES’??????!!!
    and her nose is not long!?
    ITS JUST PERFECT FOR JANEEEEEEEEE…
    BETTER THAN DAKOTA THATS FOR SURE
    and dakota has blonde hair, and i have heard that they are not planning to change her color hair for the movie…just keeping it blonde! NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!

    AND lastly, I think that the role of Jane should be someone undiscovered too…..
    oH, and….HOW CAN JORDANA ‘NOT’ LOOK LIKE JANE????
    shes the right height,
    the EXACT same hair,
    same COLOR hair,
    shes a young girl etc etc..
    So ofcourse she looks like janee…….. =S

    TEAM JORDANA, NOT DAKOTA!!!! :D

  • nicolee
    Feb 3, 2009 at 1:17 am

    TEAM JORDANA WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOP WOOOOOOOOOOOOOP

    SERIOUSLY TO THIS YEAH NO CHICK U MUST BE BLIND BECOZ EVERY SMART UNDERLINE THAT [u]SMART[/u] PERSON WOULD KNOW JORDANA IS PERFECT FOR IT !!!!!! ONCE AGAIN TEAM JORDANA ALL THE WAY !!!!!!!

  • Marie
    Feb 3, 2009 at 2:30 am

    oh yeah that jordana chick looks pretty cool. i guess its better if she isnt well known. dakoda is a very good actor, just dosent suit the part in my opinion. her face is too young.
    and i think if dakoda gets the part, apparently janes hair changed to blonde :(

  • Kate
    Feb 3, 2009 at 2:34 am

    who is jordana? i want to see her :)

  • Norine
    Feb 3, 2009 at 2:39 am

    no i dont think miranda cosgrove should play her, she is nothing like i imagined. but a good actor.
    jordi looks the part, but it really depends on if she can act. if she can thumbs up.

  • yeah.no.
    Feb 3, 2009 at 2:38 pm

    You guys are all crazy. “nicole”…DAKOTA HAS A BOTELLI LIKE ANGEL FACE. She is perfect. and Jane is SUPPOSED to have blonde hair. Also, this “Jordana” girl looks nothing like Jane. She looks like a random girl they picked off the streets. and WHO CARES if Dakota is famous. SO WAS KRISTEN STEWART BEFORE TWILIGHT. And the fact that she is famous is because she is an awesome actor. Which means she would play Jane’s part perfectly. You guys must all be blind or something…

  • message to 'yeah.no'
    Feb 4, 2009 at 1:29 am

    Ummm, ‘yeah.no.’ i think you have to read the book again! (that’s if you HAVE already =S )
    Because Jane does NOT HAVE BLONDE HAIR.
    And no one can have a face like an angel either…its impossible realllyyy.

    And Dakota Fanning WAS also a random!!
    But now she isn’t, because she audtioned and audtioned to get her first part in a movie…DUH.
    “YOU HAVE TO START SOMEWHERE.!”

    lol:P

    Every actor/actress (unless born with famous parents), ALWAYS start off a randoms.

  • xoxo
    Feb 4, 2009 at 9:14 am

    I like that Jordana girl she really looks like I imagined Jane to be, I’m not really liking the idea of Dakota as Jane.

  • caitie
    Feb 4, 2009 at 9:48 pm

    uhh..
    no. Jordana has the short brown hair, and yeah, you’re right, no one actually has a “botelli-like angel face” but the girl to play the role should probably be pretty at least. Jordana isn’t even pretty enough to fit the description of the vampires. Not to be rude, but I don’t want Janes part to be messed up, so yeah, no Jordana please.

  • Hannah
    Feb 5, 2009 at 1:22 pm

    I don’t think Dakota is VERY pretty to play the role of jane either.
    no offence .

  • sdkfjsdfklj
    Feb 5, 2009 at 3:35 pm

    I agree with “caitie”. No offense to her or anything, but she isn’t pretty enough.

  • Stella
    Feb 6, 2009 at 2:36 am

    who is jordana? can someone send me the link please thankyou ?

  • Joeys girl xxo
    Feb 6, 2009 at 3:53 pm

    the website is
    http://stephlesx13.deviantart.com/art/Jane-111305034/

    enjoy

  • sdnkal;
    Feb 6, 2009 at 4:03 pm

    not dakoda, i love her acting..but someone else would be better. someone not so famous :)

  • jill
    Feb 7, 2009 at 4:50 am

    omg i like rebekah kennedy too, amber. i looked her up and she’d be great!

    http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2796058/

  • Bonita Clearwater
    Feb 7, 2009 at 7:45 pm

    i think she’d be great! she got that innocent but cruel look. go dakota!

  • Katey P.
    Feb 8, 2009 at 11:00 am

    Dakota can definitely pull off Jane I think. She has experience and she’s young which is how I imagined Jane. I highly doubt that the books describe her as ‘dark skinned’ because… she’s a vampire. Hello! Pale skin! And they can dye her hair a dark brown. Getting a lesser-known actor would be okay, but I mean Robert Pattinson and Kristen Stewart were both kinda well-known, maybe not so much as Dakota Fanning, but this movie isn’t their first big break or anything.

    Dakota will be awesome as Jane, IMHO.

  • Christina Hostetter
    Feb 8, 2009 at 11:01 am

    I think she’d be a really good choice but…. IT’s my DREAM to become an actress and Twilight is my favourite book! I think I’d be a fantastic Jane, I’m really good, I can curl my upper lip over my teeth, I’m tiny and have brown hair like Jane. I’d be perfect for the role!

  • Christina Hostetter
    Feb 8, 2009 at 11:04 am

    And Dakota Fanning is only a year older then me! I’d be the PERFECT Jane, but I think Dakota is the best choice of people who are ALREADY famous

  • Christina Hostetter
    Feb 8, 2009 at 11:09 am

    The way they discribe Jane in the book is ” At first I thought it was a young boy. The newcomer was as tiny as Alice, with lank brown hair trimmed short. The body under the cloak- which was darker, almost black was slim and androgynous” That is how Jane is described in New Moon.

  • Christina Hostetter
    Feb 8, 2009 at 11:12 am

    Me or my friend Breanna Hobson would be perfect for the role of Jane! We live in a tiny town where it’s hard for your talent to be found, and we want this more then anyhting! We are so very talented! But I guess…… Dakota Fanning would be the best choice I mean…. There’s always Eclipse.

  • Breanna Hobson
    Feb 8, 2009 at 11:25 am

    I think that Christina would be A great role and this is coming from her best friend she has the pixie figure and the pale brown hair and short and slim and if the producer reads this please email christina at [email protected]

    She’d be perfect for the role!

  • Christina Hostetter
    Feb 8, 2009 at 11:28 am

    OMG! Thank you so much Breanna! I’m going to cry. You are the bestest friend ever! I thin Dakota Fanning would be a very good choice though, but I really want the role of Jane!

  • Christina Hostetter
    Feb 8, 2009 at 11:31 am

    Dakota Fanning I thinkis a good choice for that role, I can see her as Jane

  • Victoria
    Feb 8, 2009 at 6:15 pm

    I would love if Dakota was jane..because in the book bella mensions she looks like a little girl..i think she would be the perfect jane..beside jordana looks to old for that role and dark..

  • Amy
    Feb 9, 2009 at 8:55 am

    NO I DONT WANT DAKOTA TO PLAY JANE(no offense to anyone who likes her) i think i would make a much better jane cuz i have read all the twilight books and they make me want to be a vampire to and if i ever met robert pattison,my life would be complete. sio if anyone in Hollywood needs a cute,pretty,awesome,cool,loving,funny actress than i am available

    if u need me e-mai me at…. [email protected]

    remember my name is amy and i am a good actress

  • -x josie
    Feb 10, 2009 at 12:38 am

    i do not think dakota would be very good, she does not match what i imagined when i read the books……….
    i clicked on the link of this jordana girl and so far she has matched the most

  • Gabbyt
    Feb 11, 2009 at 2:15 pm

    No Offense, But I thin that Daktoa would be the worst pick for jane, and Jane doesn’t have blonde hair, and I just don’t think she’s right for this part at all!
    ughh

  • Gabby
    Feb 11, 2009 at 2:15 pm

    No Offense, But I thin that Daktoa would be the worst pick for jane, and Jane doesn’t have blonde hair, and I just don’t think she’s right for this part at all!
    ughh

  • Gabby
    Feb 11, 2009 at 2:22 pm

    Oh I Know how all you feel!
    I want to be an actress more then anything
    in the world! Ha It’s my biggest dream!
    and I am trying really hard to get into the
    business!
    AND I also thin I would be a
    good pick for jane too.
    I am Italian
    Short
    Brown Hair
    Dark eyes

    my e-mail is
    [email protected]

  • Darkened_Angel
    Feb 12, 2009 at 11:42 am

    Seriously..I agree with most of the above.
    Dakota Fanning is not the perosn to play Jane. Jane has the sweet abnd angelic look whick Dakota has a hint of but, Jane is to have a seriously darkened side to her..Vanessa Anne Hudgens would just ruin the whole sequel for me and alot of others who came to Twilight for a tennage romance with a real meaning to it.. not some shitty high school romance with their geek and jock romance.. Twilight has real meaning to it..Soo what Im trying to say is DONT go and ruin the sequel which has only started yet worked soo hard on and deserves by getting actors like Vanessa Anne Hudgens (who cant act to save her life) and Dakota Fanning and the Jonas Brother in and make it a disney family movie.. It a beautiful gothic-like romance…Use unknown actors as this mobie will build their reputation and they will somehow bring more talent to this amazing sequel.. There! I have told yhoo everything that has been eating away at me since I heard yhoo were going to ruin the movie by disneyizing it…

  • Twilight_Fan_1987
    Feb 13, 2009 at 1:17 am

    It is true, Jane is portrayed as Short black hair pale skin. im sorry but dakota should not play jane, she is not fit for the part, I do like dakota as an actress she is very good for a young actress but not for new moon

  • ru
    Feb 13, 2009 at 3:30 pm

    l don’t think dakota is the right person to play jane she would just steal the show and also people might not go see the movie because dakota is in it and twilight might lose some of it’s fans l think she a great actress but l just don’t see her as jane

  • ami
    Feb 15, 2009 at 8:22 am

    nooooooo way i could seeee her playing jane shes played in sooooooooooooooo many movies but all i wish is if i could play jane

  • ami
    Feb 15, 2009 at 8:25 am

    no way!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • jessie c.
    Feb 15, 2009 at 10:00 am

    ATTENTION ATTENTION HELLO LOOK HERE!!!!!!!! READ THIS!!!!!!! hey guys!!!!!!
    i was watching this interview but i wasent really paying attention BUT i was listening and they were talking about dakota fanning being jane (she will ruin this movie) and they are saying that you know like stepehine meyer is like on the set to like im pretty sure she helps the casting directors pick the parts i mean she wrote the book! ok ANYWAY they were saying that they really dont know if she should give her the part like one minute they think she should the next its a no! but filming starts in march… thats a month away….i just hope they dont pick her. seriously someone new would be great! not annasophia or dakota. i really dont want her in these movies so theres a chance she might not even be in them but at the same time…theres a chance she will be….

  • jessie c.
    Feb 15, 2009 at 10:02 am

    anyone can email me at
    [email protected]
    …if you have questions about this or about anything im here :)

  • ami
    Feb 15, 2009 at 2:04 pm

    i know dakota will be HORRIBLE in this movie

  • ami
    Feb 15, 2009 at 2:05 pm

    heres my email [email protected]

  • annoymous
    Feb 15, 2009 at 9:41 pm

    i dont think dakota fanning is right for this role. she does great in other movies but twilight and new moon are different. i think these movies are so much better without really well known actors and actresses in them. it suits it better. i think once they start casting people that have been in like a million movies and everybody knows who they are, they have ruined it..

  • annoymous
    Feb 15, 2009 at 9:48 pm

    okay!! i have talked to like most people that i know that absolutley love these books and when i mentioned that dakota fanning might be playing jane every single one of em went :o
    “you have got to be kidding me. they are completely ruining this series”
    im telling you if they put people like this in the movie they are ruining something that has become a special part in alot of peoples lives. the books were so fantastic. dont go and ruin the movies. SO i guess what im saying is NO to people like dakota fanning in this series. sorry.

  • Arielle
    Feb 17, 2009 at 9:12 am

    i have nothing against dakota fanning but honestly i dont think she is jane volturi material.she doesnt match the description

  • Elin
    Feb 17, 2009 at 9:21 am

    I think that Dakota will be quite okay for the part as Jane. I think that Jane will be more scarier if someone who lokks innocent plays her.

  • Geggia
    Feb 17, 2009 at 4:33 pm

    LISTEN TO ME PLEASE!
    I think Dakota can’t be the real Jane..
    every way,I’ll accept a actress that have:
    -dark hair
    -pair skin (in the italian version of the book,Jane has got pair skin)
    -she’s about 13
    -she’s low
    so,read it:
    -I’m 13
    -I’ve got dark hair and pair skin
    -I’m low
    -I’m italian (in the photo I’m in Volterra)
    look:
    http://blingee.com/blingee/view/84042469-Jane-Volturi?offset=0&content=Glitter-Graphics&owner=-Geggia-

    tell me what do you think

  • anonymous2
    Feb 19, 2009 at 3:19 pm

    For all those who descrice the hair color and length, they can fix that. However, I do agree she seems to sweet and I’d like a fresh face…

  • kaylar
    Feb 20, 2009 at 5:36 am

    hopefully, the casting directors and whoever are reading this but please do not put dakota as jane because I, and heaps of my friends just don’t think she is up for it.
    She’s a good actress, but I have seen better people to play the role as Jane!!

  • ^.^Millie ^.^
    Feb 20, 2009 at 5:38 am

    I AGREE
    no dakota,
    sorry. but i don’t think so and my mom doesnt either, LOL.

  • Nikki_Twilight
    Feb 22, 2009 at 7:13 pm

    Sah-ree. Jane’s supposed to have an androgynous build, right? Her hair is brown, trimmed short. I’m not sure of her but the acting-hmm…She’ll have to prove it she has the guts to play Jane.

  • clau
    Feb 22, 2009 at 7:56 pm

    OK PEOPLE REMEMBER DAKOTA AT TAKEN SHE WAS GREAT.. I THINK SHE’LL BE PERFECT FOR THAT ROLE.. THE HAIR CAN BE PANITED Y SHE HAS THAT FACE THA ITS SCARY AND SWEET AT THE SAME TIME..

  • fran...i dont think so..
    Feb 22, 2009 at 10:49 pm

    i guess clau is right, that she does have the right face but i really don’t think dakota would be the best choice for jane….there are better people out there, who look much more the part and are really good actors so i hope someone else gets it. Please, anyone but dakota..!

  • c
    Feb 22, 2009 at 10:51 pm

    message to victoria:
    Believe it or not, but I know Jordana and she is younger than Dakota =)

  • Kayla twilight obsessed!
    Feb 26, 2009 at 12:28 am

    whats jordanas last name? so i can type it into google.

  • Kayla twilight obsessed!
    Feb 26, 2009 at 12:31 am

    oh its ok, i found a link for her picture lol! she is very pretty. i think she has the right face.. cute but can be scary. she looks mysterious. what part of usa is she from?

  • Jade :)
    Feb 27, 2009 at 12:03 am

    Hi, I am an old friend of Jordana’s and she would be so perfect for the role!
    She looks just as I imagined jane, even before she told me she was going to go for the part and she is a great actress too…and she doesnt live in the usa she lives in Australia and she is so awesome so i think she WOULD have a good chance if dakota doesnt get in the way! She is JUST the right age for the part and looks just like Jane too. All the best for Jordana and if you agree with me then I will tell her what ya’ll all think!!

  • .maria.
    Feb 27, 2009 at 12:07 am

    she sounds interesting, i clicked on the link and my mom said that she will be good. and my brother thinks shes cute even though his only 7.
    go jordana, i hope you get it

  • BRIDIE-XXtwilightfan!!1
    Feb 27, 2009 at 12:10 am

    WHO IS JORDANA?????
    I WANT TO SEE HER, IS SHE FAMOUS??
    i hope she is not famous because i would like to see someone new in the movie!!!!!!!!!!!
    I don’t think I have seen anyone named Jordana in movies, SO I’M VERY HAPPY!
    i just need to see a picture.

  • BRIDIE-XXtwilightfan!!1
    Feb 27, 2009 at 12:11 am

    DONT WORRY EVERYONE I FOUND THE LINK SHE SUITS THE PART VERY GOOD!!

    XX

  • Asta
    Feb 27, 2009 at 5:49 pm

    NO WAY! they can’t have already famous person playing jane! just the same way Vanessa H cant play Leah, and thank god she didn’t get it, no offense to those guys, but you dont want to be thinking about other movies while your trying to enjoy this one, there just too well known.

  • Christina Hostetter
    Mar 1, 2009 at 6:16 pm

    I think Dakota Fanning could do a good job at it. Anna Sophia Rob? I never thought of that, she could do that role well too though I think. I still think I would have been a really good Jane.

  • !!!!!!!!!
    Mar 8, 2009 at 3:22 pm

    Dakota Fanning=Perfect

  • There
    Mar 11, 2009 at 10:17 am

    I disagree if dakota will be jane in newmoon cause she is BLONDE,NOT MYSTERIOUS,i think JODELLE FERLAND will be great as JANE volturi,cause she has dark hair,and more mysterious,and she’ll look great as jane..
    You have to see JODELLE FERLAND IN GOOGLE!!

  • gingerkid
    Mar 11, 2009 at 5:08 pm

    I feel the same as the majority of the people on here. It’s hard to imagine Dakota as Jane, but I think with the right director and the right costumes and make-up, she might be able to pull it off.

  • cheyanne
    Mar 15, 2009 at 8:12 pm

    Hello. my name isnt cheyanne but that doesnt matter. the point is that i dont think she should because is she does then i wont get the part.

  • hiba
    Mar 16, 2009 at 4:55 pm

    eeeeeeeeeewwwwwwwwww
    no, no, no, no, no
    i love twilight and i thinking casting Dakota fanning as jane would totaly ruin it and i seriously would hate it no matter ho wgood she is you need a new face like in how you picked not that famous people in twilight

    i dont like vanessa hudgens at all as lea either i think of her too much as gabrella from hsm bu ti can deal with her but deff not dakota fanning that would be the worst choice ever

  • Cheyenne
    Mar 22, 2009 at 4:57 pm

    *sigh* I didn’t read all the comments but I got tired of hearing that Jane had dark skin… here is an exact quote from the book on Jane’s looks.

    “At first I thought it was a young boy. The newcomer was as tiny as Alice, with lank, pale brown hair trimmed short. The body under the cloak - which was darker, almost black - was slim and androgynous. But the face was too pretty for a boy. The wide-eyed, full-lipped face would make a Botticelli angel look like a gargoyle. Even allowing for the dull crimson irises.”

    *sigh* I probably went overboard with the quote but… Nowhere does it say her skin is black… it’s describing the cloak, as in it’s darker than Felix’s and Demetri’s… also nowhere does it say she is Italian… Hope this clears up some confusion…

    But I do agree with most the comments, she doesn’t look the way I pictured Jane… I favor Annasophia Robb… though I’ve never seen her act… she looks right for the part

  • Cheyenne
    Mar 22, 2009 at 4:58 pm

    Oh, by the way… that’s page 456…

  • Dragonfly
    Mar 22, 2009 at 10:33 pm

    First of all, I am a huge twilight fan, read every book even the first chapter of the 5th and seen the movie a million times….Dakota Fanning would be perfect!!! Second…why is everyone saying not to use famous ppl…hello um…their was all kinds of famous ppl in Twilight!! For ex..Kristen, Edward (surely you have watched Harry Potter) and a few more. I would much rather have ppl that knew what they were doing then some newbie that could screw the movies up. Anyway they are going to choose whoever they want and in my opinion they did a wonderful job with Twilight so get over it!!!!!!

  • Response to Dragonfly...
    Mar 23, 2009 at 1:30 am

    Kinda odd you say that ‘newbie’ actors will screw up the movie when im sure kirsten and robert WERE newbies at some stage!

    You gotta start somewhere………

    and dakota is just ..ew..no.
    Shes good i guess..but there are WAY BETTER PEOPLE OUT THERE…and yes, who are not very famous, but GUESS WHAT!?
    Did you know that ALL famous people WERE ONCE NEWBIES??
    ZOMGG!!!

    *sighs* nott dakotaaa pleaseeee…:)

  • Cheyenne
    Mar 23, 2009 at 5:08 pm

    Deffinitely NOT Dakota… We need a new face… An earlier comment said that if we used Dakota or some other well-known actress, we would see her, not Jane… We need an Unknown, yet good, actor for this role.

  • jasperskk
    Apr 10, 2009 at 4:29 pm

    OMG!!!!! are you kidding me???? no way is dakota the one. she is way to nice. and i agree wit evryone who wants anna sophiea robb!!!!!! itz just that dakota is tooooooo nice and anna she kinda hints that shes got another side to her. so< Summit Entertainment, plz listen to the ppl who want anna. 4get dakota. and PS the guy whos playing caius looks the part. good pick:)

  • cheyenne
    Apr 10, 2009 at 4:57 pm

    Uhm… jasperskk… you’re a bit behind the times… Dakota has already been cast so there’s is no way they are going to change her…

  • Twilighter
    Apr 11, 2009 at 6:01 pm

    EWWWWW…..NOO DEF NOT. She’s not right at all. She doesn’t look the part, and her acting style is a bit dif. You might as well use Miley Cyrus, if your gonna use HER. Get someone a bit older, and a NEW FRESHER face.

  • Christina Hostetter
    Apr 13, 2009 at 1:56 pm

    Does anyone know where I can find info for auditions for Eclipse? I would have been PERFECT for the role of Jane. Argh so unfair.

Have an opinion? Leave a comment: